<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A promising &#8216;Performance Research&#8217; series from the YUI blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ajaxperformance.com/2006/12/03/a-promising-performance-research-series-from-the-yui-blog/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ajaxperformance.com/2006/12/03/a-promising-performance-research-series-from-the-yui-blog/</link>
	<description>A blog by Ryan Breen of Gomez</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 21:13:51 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ajax Performance &#187; Another technique for minimizing requests, image concatenation</title>
		<link>http://www.ajaxperformance.com/2006/12/03/a-promising-performance-research-series-from-the-yui-blog/#comment-5937</link>
		<dc:creator>Ajax Performance &#187; Another technique for minimizing requests, image concatenation</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2007 02:21:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ajaxperformance.com/?p=30#comment-5937</guid>
		<description>[...] Here at Ajax Performance, I spend a lot of time (here and here, for example) discussing the network-side implications of design decisions for the simple reason that there&#8217;s no better way to improve the perceived performance of an application than to do more with less bandwidth. Sure, increasing connection parallelism is a neat trick to hide some of that download pain, but fewer objects is always the best answer. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Here at Ajax Performance, I spend a lot of time (here and here, for example) discussing the network-side implications of design decisions for the simple reason that there&#8217;s no better way to improve the perceived performance of an application than to do more with less bandwidth. Sure, increasing connection parallelism is a neat trick to hide some of that download pain, but fewer objects is always the best answer. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.434 seconds -->
