





<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Testing IE8&#8217;s Connection Parallelism</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ajaxperformance.com/2008/03/16/testing-ie8s-connection-parallelism/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ajaxperformance.com/2008/03/16/testing-ie8s-connection-parallelism/</link>
	<description>A blog by Ryan Breen of Gomez</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2008 17:14:06 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ryan Breen</title>
		<link>http://www.ajaxperformance.com/2008/03/16/testing-ie8s-connection-parallelism/#comment-60889</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Breen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 12:15:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ajaxperformance.com/2008/03/16/testing-ie8s-connection-parallelism/#comment-60889</guid>
		<description>Mark,

Being wrong made me think there was a limit to concurrent connections.  It's a longstanding misconception I had, but it has since been corrected.  The only limit is per host.

I don't see any issues with my test pages.  I have intermittent problems with dreamhost, but everything appears to be functional now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark,</p>
<p>Being wrong made me think there was a limit to concurrent connections.  It&#8217;s a longstanding misconception I had, but it has since been corrected.  The only limit is per host.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t see any issues with my test pages.  I have intermittent problems with dreamhost, but everything appears to be functional now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.ajaxperformance.com/2008/03/16/testing-ie8s-connection-parallelism/#comment-60774</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 07:52:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ajaxperformance.com/2008/03/16/testing-ie8s-connection-parallelism/#comment-60774</guid>
		<description>What makes you think WinINET has any limit to concurrent connections at all?  

your test pages are broken, btw.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What makes you think WinINET has any limit to concurrent connections at all?  </p>
<p>your test pages are broken, btw.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Biondi Tang</title>
		<link>http://www.ajaxperformance.com/2008/03/16/testing-ie8s-connection-parallelism/#comment-51336</link>
		<dc:creator>Biondi Tang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 06:27:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ajaxperformance.com/2008/03/16/testing-ie8s-connection-parallelism/#comment-51336</guid>
		<description>I used IE8 getting the same page at http://demo.ajaxperformance.com and saw a quite different graph in Page Detailer.  The number of parallel connections started from 3 in the first round, 5 the second, 9 the third, and another 9 the fourth, for the total of 26 images.

While running in IE7 Emulate mode, a different graph with 6, 6, 4, 4, 6 parallel connections in 5 rounds.

I think there might be some other factors affecting the result such as file size, internet connection bandwidth, local cache...etc.

I was considering to use "web accelerator" appliance that do the same job by layer 7 protocol.  It seems that this "multi-connect" acceleration will be replaced by next version of browsers.  Any similar case to share?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I used IE8 getting the same page at <a href="http://demo.ajaxperformance.com" rel="nofollow">http://demo.ajaxperformance.com</a> and saw a quite different graph in Page Detailer.  The number of parallel connections started from 3 in the first round, 5 the second, 9 the third, and another 9 the fourth, for the total of 26 images.</p>
<p>While running in IE7 Emulate mode, a different graph with 6, 6, 4, 4, 6 parallel connections in 5 rounds.</p>
<p>I think there might be some other factors affecting the result such as file size, internet connection bandwidth, local cache&#8230;etc.</p>
<p>I was considering to use &#8220;web accelerator&#8221; appliance that do the same job by layer 7 protocol.  It seems that this &#8220;multi-connect&#8221; acceleration will be replaced by next version of browsers.  Any similar case to share?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Laniel</title>
		<link>http://www.ajaxperformance.com/2008/03/16/testing-ie8s-connection-parallelism/#comment-39731</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Laniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 12:51:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ajaxperformance.com/2008/03/16/testing-ie8s-connection-parallelism/#comment-39731</guid>
		<description>I'm surprised the browser can't learn what the optimum number of parallel connections is, and adjust over time. That seems like an obvious next step. I wonder if other browsers will learn from this performance analysis and do IE one better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m surprised the browser can&#8217;t learn what the optimum number of parallel connections is, and adjust over time. That seems like an obvious next step. I wonder if other browsers will learn from this performance analysis and do IE one better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: andrew</title>
		<link>http://www.ajaxperformance.com/2008/03/16/testing-ie8s-connection-parallelism/#comment-39724</link>
		<dc:creator>andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 11:57:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ajaxperformance.com/2008/03/16/testing-ie8s-connection-parallelism/#comment-39724</guid>
		<description>I use Opera browser. I can set up up to 128 (!) connection per server, and up to 128 connections total.

Just choose Tools-Preferences-Advanced-Network.

The defaults are 8 and 20 respectivly, and I don't know why.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I use Opera browser. I can set up up to 128 (!) connection per server, and up to 128 connections total.</p>
<p>Just choose Tools-Preferences-Advanced-Network.</p>
<p>The defaults are 8 and 20 respectivly, and I don&#8217;t know why.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pelican</title>
		<link>http://www.ajaxperformance.com/2008/03/16/testing-ie8s-connection-parallelism/#comment-39678</link>
		<dc:creator>Pelican</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 02:30:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ajaxperformance.com/2008/03/16/testing-ie8s-connection-parallelism/#comment-39678</guid>
		<description>Lovely article. I keep following your connection stuff and cannot believe it is 18 now..I use Gomez a lot and those numbers definitely make sense..BTW do you have any official confirmation of this from the IE team?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lovely article. I keep following your connection stuff and cannot believe it is 18 now..I use Gomez a lot and those numbers definitely make sense..BTW do you have any official confirmation of this from the IE team?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>


<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.243 seconds -->
